InvestorsHub Logo

Davinder Randhawa

05/01/19 8:19 PM

#138483 RE: Play4keeps2 #138481

Thank you!!!

TravO

05/01/19 8:28 PM

#138485 RE: Play4keeps2 #138481

I think he would say he cannot answer that or it is covered by the quiet period if that were so. Imo

I don’t think it’s to hard to believe everything they said about fins is true. Complications came up last minute. They tried to fix fast and failed due to lack of documentation.

That documentation was being compiled weeks ago. There is no reason imo to assume 14-18 are not already complete and they won’t be out with Q1 soon.

Just my thoughts

TravO

05/01/19 8:29 PM

#138486 RE: Play4keeps2 #138481

Massive undertaking.

RRBB started way behind while This company was growing exponentially

Lizzybird

05/01/19 8:41 PM

#138489 RE: Play4keeps2 #138481

Thanks play4keeps an direct money great post


Glta
Bird is the Word

kex0414

01/25/20 7:40 PM

#172390 RE: Play4keeps2 #138481

Again, we're talking assumptions, interpretations and impressions. Can Play4keeps2 state with specificity what was said, or was it as he says, might be all he legally could say, and was just a "brush off statement"? Play4keeps2 even questions the validity of Mark's statement.

I am trying to give mark the benefit of the doubt that even though he says that the financials are not based on court proceedings, I think legally he has to say that. {emphasis added}
These are all my assumptions based on the time line. But it all makes sense.