spin has been going on for years this way...person interviewed didn't actually say it but article always says words like overhaul, reform, etc etc
it's all spin to win stuff that has worked for years. It's a shame persons interviewed don't come out and say I didn't say that and your article needs a revision.
They are all on same train helping the NWS continue.
The only shocking thing we have right now is the en banc and that Otting removed the argument for constitutional legal agency. This was the only move made to date that seems to help GSE's win the en banc.
So why was it done and nothing else?
Only guess I have is that admin wants to not deal with clowngress and a verdict against govt gives admin power to do what they want short term. What else could it be? IMO
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
