InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

RagingBobNY

05/11/19 11:37 AM

#6751 RE: RagingBobNY #5780

I'm replying to one of my older CTX posts.

I believe this is a significant portfolio. All of QPRC's past suits were against 4 or 5 companies. CTX came out of the gate with 8! Also, QPRC had always waited for every suit to be settled before bringing on additional suits.

These suits seem to be structured that half the patents are bringing in cash (working capital to bring on more suits) quickly and other patents/claims that will play in court for a while.

Massive potential here. IMHO bigger than Semcon v Amazon.
icon url

RagingBobNY

08/08/19 9:21 PM

#7510 RE: RagingBobNY #5780

I'm replying to one of my older post on CXT. I think it is significant that more suits dropped before the Markman ruling. I guess they thought it went very well. A ton of potential here.

Old post:
Spent a little time looking at the CXT patents.

The CXT portfolio consists of twenty-nine United States patents and three pending continuation applications which cover technology relating to systems and methods of operating an accessible information database which provides for inventory evaluation, filtering according to preferences, alternative product recommendations, and access to a database of consumer feedback/evaluation.
https://www.qprc.com/cxt-systems-inc-1

- I think it is really exciting that out of the gate QPRC is suing eight companies.

- There are seven patents with over 300 claims!!!

- And it applies to so many websites. An endless amount of suits.

CXT represents the future of the company, suing with many, many patents. Suits from Mariner are based on two patents, Semcon four patents. I think you will see it with M-Red, Inc., When those suits come out they will be for many,many patents and hundreds of claims that it will be tough to fight out of.

I see a big future for QPRC.