Gers. All I can say is that Attis is intrinsically bound with gers and the Infringement case? Maybe the lawsuit wasn't clear enough? I don't go to the Attis sight because I am concerned only about what Gers is going through, and its lawsuit in particular!
How can Attis present a case if they weren't the ones who suffered Infringement damages? But who knows the depths of the entangled agreement! I knew early on that Attis voiced concern over Gers's lawsuit, and said they might help, but to initiate a Lawsuit on their own, which the post suggested, makes little sense to me on Face value?