InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stockmojo9

04/12/19 6:43 PM

#83677 RE: dnello #83676

d,

"§ 533.2 Definition of covered agreement.
(a)General definition of covered agreement. A covered agreement is any contract, arrangement, or understanding that meets all of the following criteria -
(1) The agreement is in writing.
(2) The parties to the agreement include -
(i) One or more insured depository institutions or affiliates of an insured depository institution; and
(ii) One or more NGEPs.
(3) The agreement provides for the insured depository institution or any affiliate to -
(i) Provide to one or more individuals or entities (whether or not parties to the agreement) cash payments, grants, or other consideration (except loans) that have an aggregate value of more than $10,000 in any calendar year; or
(ii) Make to one or more individuals or entities (whether or not parties to the agreement) loans that have an aggregate principal amount of more than $50,000 in any calendar year.
(4) The agreement is made pursuant to, or in connection with, the fulfillment of the CRA, as defined in § 533.4 of this part.
(5) The agreement is with a NGEP that has had a CRA communication as described in § 533.3 of this part prior to entering into the agreement."

So, we have a "covered contract".

What classification should they be in?

What about the guarantee isn't covering it?

mojo
icon url

SwissCheeseAccount

04/12/19 6:46 PM

#83678 RE: dnello #83676

Yes CT's were tier 1 capital.

To my DD I believe they weren't anymore but thanks to new laws I believe they are T1 again. I remember looking this up a while back I have to brush up but I know for a fact they were considered T1 capital at one point
icon url

Joe Stocks

04/12/19 10:42 PM

#83683 RE: dnello #83676

I don't think you know what T1 Capital is? Also being treated as T1 Capital in accounting doesn't mean it is T1 capital.