You state the other is just a holding company with a subsidiary doing all the grunt work for profit supporting the parent. How is FRLF any different? Both parents do nothing other than put out a magazine with the subsidiaries doing the grunt work for profit. FRLF magazine producing any revenue? Both are parents with subsidiaries except one is doing $25m a year in revenue and just showed a small profit. FRLF- $600K last Q with a $2.8m loss.
They are both just holding companies, the difference is the revenue from the other's subsidiary. Only posting this because you like to go to the other and post negatively when they are the same business model.