tbdelephant, that's my point with that thought...
I did. I spoke to Greg Rotman about the valuation numbers that I posted a while back. Depending on how you ask your questions and explain things is the only reason why I think we were given different food for thought.
Call Greg and ask him if he believes that VYST has a chance to get to a dollar without doing a reverse split at least as a worse case scenario after the Rotmans merger and post back what he says. Why you think they are planning on going to the NASDAQ? Read what I will post tomorrow morning and I think you should be able to clearly see that what you see as something to reduce the value in VYST is clearly something that proves that it should be on the NASDAQ after the Rotmans merger even more. I'll try to post it before the market opens.
Respectfully, I think too much time is being spent on the matter than necessary as if such is something that will slow down or stop VYST. It won't. Who cares if the valuations posted on this forum are right or wrong? Those thoughts really won't have anything to do with their plans of growth and moving forward. It's very simple. Just see them as wrong and respect that others might not agree with such thought. It's ok. The formulas are factual and are intact, but I clearly stated to use the Substitution Property to swap out any variable that makes more sense to you. It really is ok to agree to disagree regardless to who's right or wrong, especially when being right or wrong has nothing to do with the price of tea in China or with VYST goals going forward.
v/r
Sterling
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
