It looks like the evidence they want to seal is patient testimony saying that the safety and effacay have no relevance to the case at hand which is a violation of policy.
My guess is that USRM’s lawyers or hopefully the judge is reasonable in saying that you can’t have it both ways. In the FDA’s summary judgement argument they tried to bring in the three blinded ladies. And now your saying it has no bearing in court.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
