InvestorsHub Logo

WhosLying

03/27/19 1:04 PM

#77968 RE: rapz #77966

All this litigation and appeals = more money = more dilution = more patience = ruling against voip-pal. I'm sorry, but you'd be fool to stay invested in this unless you have literally nothing to lose with your investment. Most people do, though. I wouldn't be surprised to hear from the company in a few weeks that ends this whole thing. Apple will fight this just a vigorously in the EU. The invention is not really an invention if you do your DD. Emil (DB) you got some money from me, but not nearly as much as from other investors. F'ing thief.

penny2pound

03/28/19 10:10 AM

#78009 RE: rapz #77966

It's also very important for people to understand - By Judge Koh gutting the meat out of Voip-Pal's argument (something I believe will be overturned), she eliminated what she needed to find in our favor. The PTAB has no such restriction. That testimony, which Judge Koh removed from her analysis is alive and well, and absolutely before the PTAB in their complete record - which was a big part of them granting and affirming the patents, denying the IPR... So, for those who think the PTAB will simply follow suit and nod to Judge Koh - you're wrong. They have the evidence before them that she disallowed. Wrongfully.