"""Mr. Kelley's deposition. Plaintiffs should not now be permitted to perform a lobotomy and slice out portions of Mr. Kelley's state of mind simply because Plaintiffs, in hindsight, failed to thoroughly explore this issue with Mr. Kelley. Further, Plaintiffs cannot use the European Patent as a sword, to support their argument that the disclosure of the European Patent during the prosecution of certain Celtrix patents was an admission that the '414 patent is enabled,2 but then shield the fact that the European Patent was revoked. This is especially true when Insmed was aware of the European Patent, that it had been revoked, and this fact may have impacted Insmed's state of mind with respect to willful infringement. Plaintiffs simply cannot have it both ways."""
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
