Yank, Your posts are very welcome so please continue with them.
You are probably the most knowledgeable poster with regards to all the details of the conservatorships, history, players, laws, and so forth.
Don't let those posters who disagree with your views dissuade you from contributing more of your opinions or analyses. I have argued with others who think this is an "either or" win for commons or preferred, and feel it does us no good to undermine either the commons or preferred holders, we are all in this thing together and want an outcome that allows us to finally realize the value of our shares.
If we had a representative on the FNMA and FMCC board of directors, who actually represented the interests of the 20.1% common shareholders, this might help us have our interests heard and advanced. Would you consider serving on the board of either company? Most companies that have a holder of 20.1% of the shares of their stock, get a person(s) appointed or elected to serve on that board....who are these new appointees (Brooks and the other person) actually representing? And Frater, the new CEO, is he now doing the primary mission of his job, "CREATING SHAREHOLDER VALUE" or is he just a stooge for the FHFA Director?
Would love to see you involved in some way with either of the GSE's. Thanks in advance for continuing to post, I think the majority of other posters agree with me here....
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
