InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Evil Rabbit

03/23/19 4:37 PM

#39086 RE: The Lawman #39085

I thought someone (Trading?) posted a good explanation of this... Nader gets stock options, so to buy on open market he’d end up paying more in taxes? I seem to recall that was the gist of it but will happily sit down if incorrect.

As an aside, I’ve noticed almost every post you make is on the subject of Nader. Do you still believe in CYDY and Leronlimab?
icon url

BlackDoggie

03/23/19 4:40 PM

#39087 RE: The Lawman #39085

From the little bit that you talk about it, I’d have never guessed that you view it as an issue. You should probably get it over with and ask NP.

I’m familiar with the practice of insiders buying shares of their own companies. Perhaps you should do some additional research around SEC prohibitions on executives in possession of material nonpublic information conducting trading activity on their own behalf. Or research standard corporate governance practices whereby executives typically comply with rules or agreements set by their board of directors, which are typically more stringent than SEC regulations but may not be public.

Do you think that NP is allowed to buy or sell while negotiating potential licensing deals, partnerships, or sales? What about material manufacturing contracts? How long do you think that management has been holding any type of discussions that could be considered potentially material and are definitely not public?

You’ve suggested that you’re a lawyer. I’m guessing public securities isn’t your specialty.