Immune isn't being honest about something. Why would Discover want to subpoena Tony for testimony in court and why would Immune want to quash that warrant for the testimony? What could be said? Maybe that's really why they hired new CEO. IDK... That and the fact that they supposedly had an offer for Bert and turned it down when they were almost sinking... Scetch.
Sorry. All wrong Skier. Keep skiing the powder. Don’t forget to wipe. Why would the deal mean nothing if the UC results come back negative? You are wrong. They already have results that came back great for Bellous indication. That 120 mil was based off the current info that they have, otherwise there would be serious questions on what they were intending to buy and why. So no you are totally wrong. No one knows UC results.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
