I think that's right, kk. A lotto play
On the positive side, the initial study
data collection @ JHU is well underway. The timing of the $15 m is
worth noticing with respect to this. Even if they don't have all
the data, they have some, and at the mid-February mark, when the
VERY ironic Indian chewing TOBACCO-born funding company got involved
(recall the product detects cancer and the now the funders, who have
probably perpetuated untold oral cancers in 3rd world countries if I
understand their business, are going to get involved with stopping
cancer. HA). It's like Philip Morris funding a Keytruda study) they
would have had to know _something_ from that study-- something good to
unlock the vault. Like I'd say without a doubt, they have
good data and may be following up soon. $15 million is a lot to invest
without a _really_ good sign.
On the dark side, the 100 billion share structure looms like a monster
over every honest investor, especially the poor retail investors who
don't have enough shares to have anything in a catastrophic RS, or ANY
knowledge about the preliminary results. I had hoped for transparency
on this ticker w/ Groman getting involved but I really
haven't seen any. He may feel he has no responsibility to retail
investors and so yep, as lotto as it gets. Retail investors are so
comfortable knowing nothing here it's almost like watching an effed
variant of the STOCKholm syndrome. It's real hard to believe
there's nothing to report so one has to wonder what the endgame is. God
knows there must be something to tell investors, and then to not say
anything is troubling.
And no idea on the MJ sensor for law enforcement, either. It seems like
a slam dunk in the current MJ clime to be widely adopted by law
enforcement, if it was pursued aggressively, but the list of competitors
with better products being pursued by more effective developers grows by
the day-- and their development is far more transparent and less
mysterious. Wth is that Florida lawyer doing, anyway? Tiddlywinks with
the hybrid boa constrictors? Trump getting aggressive about something like this would
probably win him re-election (like nation-wide legalization with breath
sensors for every cop to use in the field would be WELL-received by the
divided US on this rare bipartisan issue), as much as it troubles me to
say it. And fwiw, I called Trump's win months before it happened-- the
writing was on the wall. I see no reason that this speculation
would end differently. If the world is determined to go to climate
hell, we might as well have some money for the party.
SD
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
