if there was an agreement to give away shares for free in exchange for the warrant holders agreeing to additional financing then ADXS would have disclosed that aspect of the agreement in the 8k
Why do you believe that have to say its for that in the 8k? They can say whatever they want. Why in the shelf filing didn't they say that they were diluting the company with an underwriter?
If you were the warrant holders asked to partake in another round, granted you will not be the only participants, would you maybe say take these warrants off my hands? If they dilute another round and if any are bought by CVI etc will you say that was illegal?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
