Replies to post #48160 on Vystar Corp (VYST)

[SooS416]

Did that company have insiders purchasing over $100k in common shares on the open market? Did that company have insiders owning over more than half the O/S?

[CA$H I$ KING]

Read and learn the difference! VYST

[Bionic Man]

Hi babe an welcome to VYST

[Dman006]

Did the other CEO have a reputable name to uphold like Rotman's do? I don't think they want thousands of investors saying they are dishonest liars hurting their furniture sales.

[doogdilinger]

na_na, if/when OTC PubCo's are implementing small reverse splits in order to qualify for a legitimate Nasdaq up listing they're completely welcome!

While the typical reverse splits in the OTC are done only to make room for additional toxic dilution!

But with VYST completely wiping out approx. $4M worth of convertible aged debt off their fully audited balance sheet since CEO Steve Rotman took over 15 months ago, and informing the market that they're going to utilize their pending official rotmans acquisition to leverage themselves onto the NAZ...VYST would only be doing a potential small reverse split if the future day ever comes that it's needed in order to meet/exceed the Nasdaq's minimum $4 share price threshold requirement.

But ever since last November a lot has changed here...and now VYST mgmt. doesn't even envision requiring a small reverse split in order to qualify for the Nasdaq's minimum $4 share price threshold in about 6 months time...and the reason VYST mgmt. no longer thinks they'll need a r/s is because they're acquiring 100% of Rotmans and buying back stock...so they anticipate the ensuing valuation metrics that will be put into full motion over the course of these next 6 months will ensure that VYST achieves the Nasdaq's $4 minimum bid threshold on its own based entirely on the dramatic increase in valuation en route.

So the 1st thing players must do when completing all their due diligence here is stop comparing VYST to all of its typical perpetual start up phase OTC market peers...because they're already head and shoulders above their market peers in that key category and have already eliminated all the convertible debt dilution out of their ever-emerging/evolving global growth equation.

And even if the future day comes in about 6 months time when they're preparing to apply for their Nasdaq up listing that perhaps they did need a small 2 for 1 reverse split in order to meet/exceed the Nasdaq's minimum $4 share price...the over-whelming majority of their shareholders would welcome it with open arms at that time because it would be being done for ALL the right reasons glty>>>

https://www.investor.gov/additional-resources/general-resources/glossary/reverse-stock-splits