Replies to post #76646 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[straightword]

gastric this is a great summary of the TRUTH about all that is happening. When will ALICE be completed VPLM followers? This sounds to me like we are all ins tore for an endless amount of "patience is a virtue" from the restaurateur!

[lbird33]

So, in conclusion this is what VPLM has.

* Some patents that are still hanging in the balance with PTAB. They could still be invalidated.
* A court case that's just begun and in the ALICE phase. They could still be invalidated at this step, and most are.
* No infringement ever proven.

Ok, lets keep this post in mind and hopefully get your thoughts when they win again in the PTAB and Alice. It's a negative now people, lets see if it becomes a positive.

Unless this will be treated like any other negative we've heard here for the past 5-6 years.

We always here prove it. When it is proven, no positive comments, just move on to something else.

Kind of reminds me of the most recent comment "European patents can be opposed". That's behind us and surprise, surprise. A negative that is now a positive, but just pushed aside and not even acknowledged.

Any patent expert will acknowledge that an IPR sweep is unbelievable. Nobody is saying it's the end all, but amazing how some can't even acknowledge it as a positive.

VPLM is running, no, sprinting towards the courts to PROVE IT!!!! If they could be there tomorrow, they would.

In VPLM's own words
If provided the opportunity to engage in discovery, VoIP-Pal would elicit evidence to show that a VoIP system is inherently a computer network,19 and that a VoIP system may use non-PSTN protocols such as Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and a variety of caller/callee identifiers, including proprietary identifiers that are incompatible with PSTN callee identifiers.20 Consequently, for any routing controller or call controller intended to interoperate with both private and public network elements, there is a requirement for computer-based methods of communication to bridge the divide. Indeed, the patented method could not be performed without computing equipment such as the routing controller.

This time, when it is proven, this will be all over. So no new negative. I can't wait.

[Plowmaster]

Emil relies on the common shareholder to have no understanding of the court process to run this bullshit scam.

He knows it will be tied up forever in the courts. He purposely bought IP that has such a general sense of application (every one with a cell phone!) but no actual claims can be made that have merit.

The PTAB is worthless , yay you own the patents. That’s all that says. Has nothing to do with any actual application and value.

But since it’s in the same realm they know the court process that is inundated with these bullshit patent troll plays will take years and years.

All he did was create a faucet of cash for him and he’s been drinking from it ever since at the cost of the shareholder.

Nothing but toxic death here until the eventual dismissal.