Replies to post #35086 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[tradetrak]

Thanks for putting those ducks on full display and in a neat row, Mad. Now, your assessment of the situation now that it's all in?

[bbhuey]

Wow that is a lot of reading to absorb.

What I get out of it is

Bungie says

1 ATVI is not a real party in interest

2.Wddd waived discovery

3.The provisions should apply to WDD

4.THe previous PTAB rationale should apply
.5.Bungie brought suit because WDDD threatened to sue them.

Worlds says.

1. They are time barred
.
2. The provisions should not apply and the CAFB
Solicitor guidance should be followed on the provision and discovery

3.ATVI is a RPi and not an IPR

4.The issues with each of the patent claims should be addressed