Replies to post #18474 on Cel Sci Corporation (CVM)

[Fosco1]

Frankly speaking

It would help a lot that they would communicate :

- approx number of observed events to date (we know that the do monitor this number)
- a confirmation of the initial pool of evaluable patients (is it 794 ?) in both arms

This would allow lots of people, and not only on MB, to compute the figures and confirm that current pace of events is a really good sign.

- I would like eventually to understand as well why they are blinded. There is no reason, the criteria for success being patients survival, there cannot be subjective bias to the study caused by the investigator

With Cel Sci past history, every thing that seems to be concealed looks suspicious unfortunately and a bit of full transparency could be salutary for a change !