Replies to post #34986 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[sellhibylo]

Thank you Quilt, for taking the time to write that analysis, very comprehensive.

[Captart7]

Wow, thank you for all you do. This was a lot of detailed work to produce especially on the cuff. I know we all appreciate it.
Supercalifragalisticexpealidocous Job!!!

[buylosellhi]

Thanks for this quilt, the time you spend on analysis is very much appreciated and we always look forward to your posts.

[tradetrak]

Thanks for the detailed analysis, Quilt and I agree on the RPI issue.
However, the question that keeps coming up for me - maybe I missed it but I don't believe it has been discussed on the board - is what aspect(s) the non-appealed cases is(are) WDDD claiming is(are) different enough from the appealed cases that they do not provide a basis for CE? Is it related to these oft referenced "exceptions"? Or am I just seriously missing something here?