Replies to post #34972 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[DDobserver]

Excellent respone.

[White Coal]

Yes Data. I've read it

I believe the CE issue prevents them from further litigation (1325). The fact this was not appealed in 1321 creates issue preclusion.

World's cannot simply throw darts at the wall, hoping something sticks.

In your opinion "The burden is on Bungie to prove they are not an RPI to Activision". I simply disagree.

IMO I agree with the brief: "Worlds permitted the final IPRs to become
preclusive with respect to matters actually litigated therein. This includes RPI"

Understandably, we have differed opinions.
Will be interesting to see this play out :)

A bunch of non lawyers evaluating a complex and nuanced reply brief that does not address the core remand issues is nothing more than entertainment.

Exactly!
Very entertaining