Replies to post #34940 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[stark12]

In this reply brief, Bungie's attorney makes this statement: "Worlds errs by arguing IPR decisions cannot be preclusive. Worlds argues (at 12-14) that IPR decisions cannot be preclusive" and other similar assertions about preclusion.

My question to the legal eagles: If the CAFC has vacated the previous IPR decision, then there is no IPR decision to preclude. Is this correct or am I missing something?

[madprophet]

Now that s pretty strong.
I need to read through that a few times and look up those other cases cited.

Reread through all of the filings and then formulate what I think.

Looks likeI have some light reading to do the next few days...lol