InvestorsHub Logo

taas

02/19/19 11:05 AM

#256625 RE: loanranger #256620

LR, I agree with your STFU comment. However, there are many additional points of contact that could be a potential source than the two you mentioned.
Everyone should take these types of claims with a pinch of salt.
Nerby's infamous post last year is an example.
MXAM's 'communication with a non-existent sales department in IPIX is another.

DaubersUP

02/19/19 2:47 PM

#256637 RE: loanranger #256620

Nope. Just a bunch of investors with 7 digits invested with ears to the ground in the industry. I believe what some of them say and also know a few have been wrong on the science. (Prurisol) Every drug in ipix pipeline could flop. It’s not proven until it hits the market.

But one has suggested there is a goal to be rocking a trial by summer. That gives us 5 months. This is nothing more than people saying ipix is going BK by April. All opinions. Who you believe is the difference.

What if this Patent was key to some ink? What if March comes along and a very detailed deal is done and BP owns the trial and can move it towards Lightspeed with fda.


Tides will turn. IMO. I will pick up another 60k shares because I believe in this company. That is why I’m here.