I don't deny the first two, only an idiot would, but I fail to see the relevance of those two items in the grand scheme of what VPLM is trying to achieve....Which is (in my opinion) a sale of the company and its IP to an infringer or private equity group which specializes in monetizing patents.
Your last point doesn't make sense to me as a patent is not granted by a court of law. Are you asking has VPLM prevailed in defending any of their patents in a court of law, thereby differentiating between their win at PTAB vs an actual court case?