InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

YanksGhost

02/01/19 11:13 AM

#500759 RE: chessmaster315 #500747

Unless the XX for how much market share each guarantor can hold gets filled in with numbers to support F&F's 70% present share, this is a BOMB delivered on the heads of shareholders.
icon url

RCChristian

02/01/19 11:14 AM

#500760 RE: chessmaster315 #500747

But the securities guarantees will be explicit and other competitors have access to this business. With explicit backing that means a high fee. 30 yr mortgages costs will spike. The GSE will no longer dominate the market in the future. So the bill just basically turns the GSEs to 2 big PMI companies.
icon url

stoxjock

02/01/19 11:21 AM

#500770 RE: chessmaster315 #500747

"They make it clear fannie and freddie will (continue) to guarantee loans (i.e., private mortgage insurance). The PMI collected by borrowers is a major source of income/revenue stream for fannie and freddie."

I think you are failing to recognize that while they may have 'guarantor' revenues, the risks of 'guarateeing' far outweigh the benefits because under this proposal they will have much lower volume of the 'guarentee' business...