InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

FaithfulAndTrue

01/31/19 2:25 PM

#500434 RE: observer21 #500433

Because it is grasping at straws. If it were valid, it would have applied to Mel Watt as well!
icon url

Clutch29

01/31/19 2:44 PM

#500442 RE: observer21 #500433

Keyword is "may". You dont just write a letter saying something like this without knowing its true. Its a clear attempt to go againts Trump again by the democrats
icon url

HoldenWalker99

01/31/19 2:46 PM

#500444 RE: observer21 #500433

I've been struggling with this for a few days and can't get a straight answer.

Under Federal Vacancy Reform Act (1998), seems legit. Under HERA (2008), questionable (I think). And the administration takes issue with the "next in line Deputy" framework because the Appointments Clause of the Constitution requires Senate confirmation for these positions.

Otting used "Presidential-appointed" in his letter to Waters/Brown, so he's rolling with it.
icon url

jog49

01/31/19 2:50 PM

#500447 RE: observer21 #500433

What Waters and Brown are up to is called obfuscation. Any well-heeled equity holder knows what they are up to and its insignificance.
icon url

kennedytrading

01/31/19 2:53 PM

#500448 RE: observer21 #500433

Waters and her finance colleagues are attempting to block. That is what happens. I smell a rat.
icon url

Release us

01/31/19 3:10 PM

#500457 RE: observer21 #500433