The difference between $180k a year in salary that should have been what they took for the “brain trust” of this operation and the $420k a year they gave themselves is $240k this past year they could have used to pay down any of the toxic notes that they let mature to further dilute shareholders - or for any other other of the general expenses. Or for the millions lost when the illegal actions of Glauser’s and Smiths actions that cost the two licenses in Oregon. Or how about an auditor that sees filings in time and not going delinquent bordering on a skull and crossbones in three days. Or how about an IR program to generate interest and new shareholders? Nope. They decided to get theirs while they could. And screw the structure or enhancing shareholder value or demonstrating leadership. It’s no wonder there is a new posting on indeed.com almost every week for employees. It’s not because they’re growing but because their entitlement is toxic and leads to employees disgusted with their management. See the exit of the president and CFO - never mind the turnover of grunt techs at the Labs - the latest being for a lab director in Berkeley. That’s like the third one in the last year. Must be “market conditions” and not a micromanaged toxic workplace run by ego-driven know-nothing incompetents driving talented people from this deal. Right?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
