Replies to post #21983 on SiNtx Technologies Inc (SINT)

[SmokerX]

I think I compared the FDA wording to prove it to myself in a recent post they're referencing a coorstek material. Time will prove one of correct here. Why would the shill company even use coorstek if this isnt the case?? EXACTLY substantially equivalent. The new Zimmer 510K says exactly the same not substantially equivalent. On another note my mistake incorrectly using ZTA as Aluminum oxide ceramics.