InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

staticmirror79

01/28/19 2:53 PM

#17956 RE: The_Q #17952

Thanks for all the helpful responses! This helps me feel better about what I'm holding. The FDA thing is the biggest positive signal to me.

Quick question for you Q. So were these two statements he made false because they didn't have enough data aka deaths to determine if it was safe for patients since they were delaying standard protocol for 21 days because the benefit was unknown at the time? But now the FDA released the hold because they had more data which was probably showing that Multikine was helping so it was no longer an unknown hold?

"Because the company was informed by independent data monitors in 2014 and again in 2016 that the Multikine study should have been shut down early."

"The FDA refused Cel-Sci’s request. Then, the agency halted the clinical trial entirely, telling the company there was an “unreasonable and significant risk of illness or injury to human subjects” participating in the study. The FDA stepped in to protect patients after learning belatedly about the independent monitors’ failed effort to stop the study. "

icon url

Fosco1

01/28/19 4:57 PM

#17963 RE: The_Q #17952

I agree 100% with The_Q.
Feurstein is not credible this time, the Johnny in him has too much taken on him or reversely :-) But nice try !
Regarding S/P in the eventuality of a positive outcome, my recommandation would be not sell at any price until a buy-out happens _and it will happen_ because it could be anywhere between 1B and 10 B ! 1B would be the minimum I believe (20$ ps)
icon url

zeezeeman

01/28/19 9:11 PM

#17967 RE: The_Q #17952

2. The FDA withdrew the hold because they knew of potential benefit

Huh? How do you know that was the reason the FDA withdrew the hold?