InvestorsHub Logo

Sheriff2

01/19/19 8:58 AM

#92098 RE: Southern Gal #92096

Why don’t you ask them instead of speculating?

lflhdy

01/19/19 10:23 AM

#92099 RE: Southern Gal #92096

Maybe they weren't recognized for their work soon enough. I know I helped build a auto parts store from garbage to success and was never rewarded for it and when I told them I was moving on then they wanted to offer me the moon. By then it was to late.

T-Sizzzle

01/19/19 12:16 PM

#92101 RE: Southern Gal #92096

Yours is a fair question. Let me partially answer it with another question. How many of us are still with the first company we ever worked at?

There are as many reasons to leave a job as there are people doing them. If that were a net negative, then no one who ever left a job would ever gain employment again.

Some guys are serial entrepreneurs. They get the biggest kick out of building something. Premium Brands matured, the excitement of exponential growth is gone.

That's one possibility, and it's a positive one for DMAN shareholders. If this team of "misfits" from Premium Brands is driven to build DMAN into a massive success, you'll benefit.

If you're fat and happy, you stay with Premium Brands. These guys have been working towards launch for well over a year, ostensibly for no or very little pay. You don't do that if you don't have it in your DNA. The ticker should have been DNAMAN.

I don't know what the truth is as to why they are no longer with Premium Brands. From what I see them currently doing with my investment, I don't need to look that gift horse in the mouth.

Previously, I've invested in products or technology in penny stocks. I've learned that is a mistake. At least it's not the most important factor in your investing success in penny stocks. The team running the company is much more important than the widgets they're trying to sell.
You can have the best product or idea ever, but without the wherewithal to bring it successfully to the market, your product or idea is dead in the water. And there will be shareholders scratching their heads wondering how this "slam dunk" didn't get off the ground. Which would you rather have, zero sales on the best idea ever, or enormous sales on a so-so or 'me too' idea? I'm sure we'd all take the REVENUE!