InvestorsHub Logo

Russ777

01/12/19 2:34 AM

#70183 RE: One_Life83 #70182

Yes, maybe they should. IMO. Given the lack of substantive evidence of claims made, that would seem prudent, IMO.

Well then maybe EAPH should be suspended then considering that they're not even current with the SEC.

Dogman 1955

01/12/19 11:11 AM

#70185 RE: One_Life83 #70182

I suspect EAPH has been under the yield sign or the stop sign more than 182 1/2 of the last 365 days which speaks for itself. Why would EAPH all of the sudden become honest? If EAPH is honest where is all that G.R. & Bayer revenue parked?? Maybe a director's account ?Or possibly there never was any G.R. & Bayer revenue? After all EAPH admitted to not having a bank account in their fins. How many names does EAPH"S ceo Evan Karras use for business purposes ? Too many red flags here in my opinion.
A pharmaceutical in the construction business? I have a friend in the construction business , and he does not claim to sell obscure, over the counter pharmaceutical products. jmo of course.