It's troubling - that Apple, yet again, even after having been "spanked" for it's tone and insinuations of impropriety against the board, can't seem to help itself from again, raising those same spectres. It sounds to me, and most SURELY will sound to the board as improperly making wild insinuations of collusion. One does not get far in any court by impuning the character of the judges. Nor the intelligence. This reads like a desperate attempt, and if I were a judge, I might feel rather insulted to be accused of such ignorance in overlooking key factors in a matter like this. Clearly these points were not "hidden" to the replacement board, but rather, very well weighed, measured, and ruled upon. Knobbe Martens will rip this apart. Mark my words.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
