InvestorsHub Logo

noreen

01/04/19 6:05 PM

#9371 RE: Machine371 #9370

I was actually just baiting you (or the guy who made the original comment) to give the exact answer that you did so that I can prove you dead wrong. I don’t have time now, but I’ll write a longer response tonight.

noreen

01/05/19 12:19 AM

#9372 RE: Machine371 #9370

They are trying to avoid delisting from OTCQB and are willing to dilute shareholder value to kick the can down the road and try and dupe future investors.



You say they are trying to avoid delisting. So why did they cook the books down $2m with the Marshall Faulk note (which would increase their chance of heading towards delisting)? What was the purpose of them cooking the books down with $2m in fake penalties that they knew they never would have to pay?

noreen

01/05/19 1:36 PM

#9373 RE: Machine371 #9370

Do you think it would logically make sense for them to cook the books down $2m with the Marshall Faulk note (which would hurt the stock price, making delisting more likely), and now all of a sudden be forced to R/S so that they can avoid delisting. How would that logically make sense exactly?

Instead, why didn’t they just not cook the books down?

Do you see that there are likely flaws in your logic, and perhaps you are wrong about the R/S being to avoid delisting?