Point taken..Scratch Keystone Kops comedy film and insert Abbot & Costello "Who's on First" classic.....
..."Abbott: Well, let's see, on the team we have Who's on first, What's on second, I Don't Know is on third… Costello: Are you the manager?"
Supposedly, AG bought Nipton for $5m...turned around and created Nipton Inc shell..kept pouring more money into Nipton Inc, turned around and "paper" sold to CANX for a supposed gain, only to find financials confirming sold at a loss..Then pumps AG signed a 20yr Nipton mgmt fee with CANX, only to find in both companie's financials last Q that neither reported any Nipton revenues and ERBB received no Nipton mgnt fees..Huh? ..so, if neither ERBB nor CANX claiming Nipton revenues, that leaves (supposed) 100% owned subsidiary Nipton Inc..and one would think those revenues would appear somewhere within ERBB to CANX..or is paperwork purposely set up not to?
Abbot-"ERBB owns Nipton...No they dont, CANX does..No, wait..Nipton Inc is the owner..But ERBB owns Nipton Inc..No they dont, CANX does..But who is reporting the Nipton revenues?
Costello-"Who the hell cares..So what if AG shareholders keep loaning (per financials) CANX money.. or AG shareholders keep paying Nipton consultants without reimbursement? Who cares if ERBB on 1st, or CANX on 2nd, or Nipton Inc on 3rd..I'm batting bigly at $2m 50% CD conversions and monthly consultant fees"..#Niptondeception