It's pretty clear to me that you made the statement without any knowledge of the facts. Why not just admit that you bluffed and were caught in your folly?
Actually, I think he proved his point and intent. Digitalway does NOT appear to be a "multi-billion dollar company", no matter how you define it.
Back in 2000-2001 they said they were negotiating with 10 or more "multi-billion dollar OEMs" to license their music player reference design. Since there aren't that many multi-billion dollar OEMs that are in the MP3 player field, what did they mean by stating that?
Actually, I believe it was 3 such companies. Who are you to say who they were talking to or not. Intel was one I believe, but they pulled their plans for an MP3 player with Eastech. Your point really isn't one. The environment in the music business never gravitated toward a "need" for secure music, which is why most OEM's would have wanted EDIG's technology in the first place. None of us have firsthand knowledge of who they were or were not in negotiations with
It is similar to their much more recent claims that "they" were negotiating with 9 airlines for the IFE device. Now it's fully known that e.Digital is not the entity that negotiates with airlines for the device a customer, APS, had EDIG produce. It's obvious now that e.Digital was never "negotiating" with any airline, let alone 9 just as they were never in any real negotiations with 10 or more "multi-billion dollar OEMs."
Fully known? Bah! Nothing is known about who spoke to who, except that it was Boyer who approached Alaska. That is one, count 'em, one, airline. Again, you generalize from minutia. Fact is, again, none of us have no idea who has spoken with whom regarding this topic. EDIG has said that airline approached them directly after the first IFE PR. So be it. If they refer those same airlines to APS, fine. That's the process. You are also guessing (as I stated I was) that EDIG does not participate in the negotiations with the airlines. This may be way off base, since they might easily be there to
negotiate the refurbishment/replacement issues. They may NOT be all fixed, as we surmised earlier. Just because you believe it doesn't make it true.
The points you seem to have missed from my previous post is that you made statements about Digitalway's market cap that showed you did not know what you were talking about and that no one knows what e.Digital is referring to in using the term "multi-billion dollar OEM."
Actually, the point you seemed to be making with your posting was that the OEM referred to was Digitalway. I think there is ample evidence posted here to easily refute that claim. JMO of course.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
