Replies to post #5980 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[bag8ger]

OT: Worktoplay,

At the risk of startling those who can't quite see what I see on my level 4, you have, I believe, slipped over into that Universal zone from where you are able to defend DNAP forcibly and with an inspired conviction impenetrable. JMHO, of course.

[chig]

Spook & W2P:

Aside from Worktoplay just showing Spook how wrong he is, let me put it in Spookie terms:

It was only a lie if Dr. Frudakis knew(at the time he said it) that it would never actually happen.

I know for a fact that he believed it could and would happen. Other circumstances changed his strategy.

If you(Spook) assume that the warrants program was invented to merely swing a vote, then you are wrong.

And if you actually think that it did swing the vote, you had better get into another line of investing.

[spook]

(worktoplay/chig) The proxy statement and the letter to shareholders are two entirely seperate documents. So it's ok for management to lie in a letter to shareholders as long as it's disclaimed in a legal document? Hmmmm....

If you're comfortable with that then I have nothing more to say. I find it amazing that DNAP has such a large amount of shareholders (bagholders?) who accept being lied to by management.

But, it's your money...

_spook
alwaysontop

BTW, chig - worktoplay did not prove me wrong. I never mentioned the proxy - it has nothing to do with the letter to shareholders as far as I'm concerned.