InvestorsHub Logo

tradetrak

11/20/18 6:43 PM

#33772 RE: piratica #33771

Yeah, I was looking at that just this afternoon. Seems to be in reaction to a revenue miss on 11/8 but it seems a bit overdone on that front. I'm wondering is some of it is in response to the teleconference outcome.

Long term

11/24/18 2:00 PM

#33780 RE: piratica #33771

I'm in the same spot and will not sell xspa until I have large Gaines in wddd, uoip or Vplm it's the only way out of the old vrng. Notice at xspa top mgt has changed significantly. Wounder if with the changing I P process if the new mgt there will investigate legal firms who would take on xspa' a review of the 500 + - patent they hold select good possablities and on a contingent basis file suit on those infringing. If xspa ' s mgt was smart they would seek wddd or uoip's law firms to see if they'll represent them on contingency. They've got the patents let's find out if they're worth what was thought and just let that legal firm do what they do. There's no cost to xspa except the contingent fee. So they get 40% those patents aren't making them anything in the library. Perhaps xspa' play would be to invest a small sum in wddd or uoip. Perhaps it would show support of those legal firms efforts with wddd / uoip. If a successful legal firm took on xspa' s patent portfolio it would have a positive effect on xspa' pps. After all vrng got pretty close with both ZTE and google. Those factors that took effect in those cases is all but eliminated.
The above appears to be emphasizing xspa where but no the point is there are very good firms which would be worth looking into .... xspa should go to the firms that are representing wddd, uoip as a start in the search of representation.
Had thought about shorting Activision just befor wddd got big positive news but it now will have to regain the most recent drop. They'll probably do this first Q or soon thereafter so no worries since this will be going (wddd).
Into late next year.