InvestorsHub Logo

Rocketred

10/26/18 8:57 PM

#626 RE: JackieTreehorn #625

CS Balala why was he not in court ?

This is also Bullshit by the Kenya Government

On the other hand, the Government raises the preliminary point that the Claimants have no
claim because SML 351 was never revoked. It was just “suspended” pending review of the Task
Force. No treaty relief is available in respect of a mere “suspension”, decided in the proper conduct
of Government business.

Rocketred

10/26/18 9:01 PM

#627 RE: JackieTreehorn #625

CS Balala’s revocation of SML 351 on 5 August 2013 was arbitrary, malicious and
a clear excess of power under the licence, the Mining Act and the Constitution. He
has been conspicuously absent from these proceedings. Even if the Tribunal were
to find SML 351 void ab initio, the arbitration provision in SML 351 is separable
and valid

makinezmoney

10/27/18 2:43 AM

#628 RE: JackieTreehorn #625

Balala was clearly looking for a lil something for his own.

When he didn’t get what he wanted (a $1Million bribe) he turned.

So then.... who’s fault is it now ?

The one expecting to receive a bribe in order to administer
A mining licence or the one that refuses to oblige to
Give in to it for fear that it is immoral and improper.

President Kenyatta gave the go-ahead without any indication of a bribe.


Don’t tell me that you believe a Corrupt politician like
Balala. Corrupt politicians in Kenya are a dime-a-dozen.... Balala is no saint. He is the perpetrator and abused power of his office for personal gain.

This annulment review certainly favours PWCRF in light of Balala transgressions.