the Cox regression adjusted hazard ratio is 1.8, ie 80% prolongation of median OS, or close to 50% reduction in risk of death, powering the study at 90% would only require 1definitely will require only 122 events (scary thought - I have to go back to my event curve to find where they are at - I wouldn't be surprised that can be reached at in early 2007).
I suspect that P3 is NOT accounting for Cox Regression of 9902b in his powering analysis. He is just answering the question "Assuming the HR found by Cox Regression in combined 9901/9902a is the true HR (the same found in plain Log Rank for an infinitely large trial), then what is the powering of 9902b when the analysis method of 9902b is plain Log Rank". Make a huge difference? Probably not. But some since no credit is given for 9902b Cox Regression.