Replies to post #82396 on iTalk Inc. (fka TALK)

[elkonig]

They've had over a year to respond and have failed to do so. There wont be any phone call Nov.28th because they will be revoked before then.

[lucky, mydog]

wrong.

https://www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders/2018/ap-6201.pdf

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Administrative Proceedings Rulings
Release No. 6201 / October 16, 2018
Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-18208
In the Matter of
HydroPhi Technologies Group,
Inc.,
iTalk Inc.,
Soellingen Advisory Group, Inc.,
and
U.S. Rare Earths, Inc.
Order Finding Service,
Directing Respondents to Show
Cause, and Scheduling
Prehearing Conference
On September 25, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued
an order instituting proceedings (OIP) against Respondents under Section
12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. After a prior initial decision was
vacated by the Commission, the proceeding was reassigned to me on
September 12, 2018. Pending Admin. Proc., Admin. Proc. Rulings Release
No. 5955, 2018 SEC LEXIS 2264, at *2–3 (ALJ). The parties were provided
the opportunity to propose how further proceedings should be conducted.
HydroPhi Techs. Grp., Admin. Proc. Rulings Release No. 6008, 2018 SEC
LEXIS 2388 (ALJ Sept. 18, 2018). None of the Respondents filed a proposal.
The Division of Enforcement represents that it was unable to contact any of
the Respondents.
1
On September 29, 2017, the Division submitted a declaration of service
that establishes that it served Respondents with the OIP by September 28,
2017, by mailing the OIP by U.S. Postal Service Priority Mail Express to each

1 The former CEO of Soellingen Advisory Group, Inc., told the Division
that he did not contest revocation, but because he had resigned, he was
unsure who controlled the company.
2
Respondent’s most recent address shown on its most recent filing with the
Commission in accordance with Rule of Practice 141(a)(2)(ii). 17 C.F.R.
§ 201.141(a)(2)(ii). As such, their answers were due by October 11, 2017. OIP
at 3; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.160(b), .220(b). To date, no Respondent has answered.
I ORDER that, by October 26, 2018, Respondents shall SHOW CAUSE
why the registration of their securities should not be revoked by default due
to their failure to file answers or otherwise defend this proceeding. If
Respondents fail to respond to this order or otherwise defend the proceeding,
they will be deemed in default and the registrations of their securities will be
revoked. OIP at 3; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a)(2), .220(f).
I FURTHER ORDER that a telephonic prehearing conference will be
held on November 28, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. EST, if this matter has not been
concluded before then.
_______________________________
James E. Grimes
Administrative Law J