Replies to post #47546 on Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[Harry Winston]

It's better for Greenshift to keep the other customers they already have for their products and services. Those customers might be able to increase the amount of their purchases.

If any of the infringing companies go out of business because their business model is devastated by their payments to their lawyers in their losing legal effort and the court-ordered payment to Greenshift, their own existing customers are more likely to become candidates to become Greenshift's new customers than the infringing companies.

Those customers are already buying products made from the waste parts of the corn plant. If they sent purchase orders to Greenshift instead of any of the infringing companies, it would be a very small change in their own business model.

[Harry Winston]

My words:

I want Greenshift's customers to have enough financial resources to pay them for the products and services they receive from Greenshift.

Dutch's words:

So then it’s better they don’t go out of business.

There's no danger that the Appeals Court would make any of Greenshift's customers go out of business. You made a mistake. You meant to write that the infringing companies, who are not Greenshift's customers, could go out of business if the court rules against them.

The Greenshift Corporation wouldn't let any company remain as a customer if it infringed on their patents, would they?

THINK, Dutch. If Greenshift allowed the infringing company to remain as a customer, there would be an increased danger of a continuing infringement and a very dangerous reduction in Greenshift's ability to take any legal action against that company because of their infringement.

You made a mistake. Please be a gentleman and admit it.