Replies to post #45566 on BioAmber Inc fka BIOAQ

[Inertech]

I can accept that fate if it comes. Most likely it won’t happen I mean I’d be truly shocked if it did. I’m no pumper if I thought his stock was a loser I’d admit it but I wouldn’t even be on this board if that was the case. Go BIOAQ

[Inertech]

I think Mitsui is confused and wants all the information I believe it was worded that they would watch the remainder of the Canadian sale and see how it turns out basically. I think they want the info released but also hard to believe they were not privy to that information also. So much weird stuff with this situation that just makes no sense. But dang it’s exciting isn’t it!

[serious38]

Are you trying to say that Mitsui knows the number ( the redacted value) that all shareholders incl. Mitsui are waiting to see?

[BeetBroker]

Can you please provide some specific references that back up these statements? I haven’t been able to find anything in the available information (monitors reports, filings, pacer documents) that is definitive to EITHER outcome but you speak as though there is something somewhere that we are all missing that would make it obvious that we shouldn’t be buying bioaq.

[Homebrew]

Let's play "Guess Share Cancel Date", I'll start: Oct 25.

Closest guess gets 50 Plus1 coins. Ties split the 50.

All entries must be posted by tomorrow.

[GhengisJohn]

And there is this:
The CCAA was enacted by Parliament in 1933 when the nation and the world were in the grip of an economic depression. When a company became insolvent liquidation followed because that was the consequence of the only insolvency legislation which then existed - the Bankruptcy Act and the Winding-Up Act. Almost inevitably liquidation destroyed the shareholders' investment, yielded little by way of recovery to the creditors, and exacerbated the social evil of devastating levels of unemployment. The government of the day sought, through the CCAA, to create a regime whereby the principals of the company and the creditors could be brought together under the supervision of the court to attempt a reorganization or compromise or arrangement under which the company could continue in business.[1]