Replies to post #33371 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[buylosellhi]

Bescaredxx explained this all in his post here: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143819068

In case you missed it, he also calls out how this could turn out bad for WDDD.

[cinnamonpee]

Using the CE argument only makes sense if Worlds is denied discovery again. The claims are only lost if Worlds can't convince the ptab Judge's that discovery was screwed up. If they can't, then others on the board(including myself) believe there will be another appeal to the Cafc. My opinion is that the order is written where CE comes first when it should have been last. Also, My understanding of the CE issue, if applied would be that worlds would lose 6 claims. The 3 that weren't appealed as Worlds believed would correct themselves if/when they were able to prove their case through discovery, and also the 3 claims Worlds just appealed at the Cafc. Which would not be good for them. How many claims have worlds won already which are not part of this? I'm not sure but I believe losing to CE doesn't kill the case. Let me know if I am misunderstanding something. I'm not afraid of getting something wrong. It would be a great learning experience.