Replies to post #6517 on Sector 10, Inc. (SECI)

[ABBAZABBA]

And I quote:

"The direct impact on the valuation of the Plaintiff / Sector 10 companies and its shareholders is considerable. SECI was forced to do a reverse split, not once but three times, to ensure the company and the stock would survive the shorting and other market manipulations as the result of defendants’ actions. All three stock reversals where approved by the Security Exchange Commission and succeeded in keeping the company afloat, although now on the OTC Market (pink-sheets)."

This was dated 04/16/2018. So 5 months before this stock took off. Got it.

[lineItemVeto]

Wonder if this math is part of what got the suspension

Many of the shares on the market today represent a 26 to 1, followed by a 10 to 1, and finally a 500 to 1 reverse split. The possibility that many of the consolidated single shares today are worth 130,000* of the “old” shares (before the triple reverse split) needs further examination. (*1 x 26 x 10 x 500)

[jfkspire]

This Stuff is Golden!!! Could this be reason why the Stock was suspended!!! And ,,hence,, the CEO 's Cheers to the SEC????????!!!!!! The SEC was maybe protecting current shareholders and the Company!! (In my Opinion)

https://www.sector10.com/copy-of-pr-2-20-18. The direct impact on the valuation of the Plaintiff / Sector 10 companies and its shareholders is considerable. SECI was forced to do a reverse split, not once but three times, to ensure the company and the stock would survive the shorting and other market manipulations as the result of defendants’ actions. All three stock reversals where approved by the Security Exchange Commission and succeeded in keeping the company afloat, although now on the OTC Market (pink-sheets).


Just my Opinion and Conclusion!!!





$$SECI$$

[HoldEm777]

We I took a look back at my own post considering the "MATH" and the tweets from the Company trying to see if I missed something....I caught something in that post that I have yet to key in on........may be grasping for straws but....have I been missing what's really possibly in question here on top of the theft of Tech?

SECI was forced to do a reverse split, not once but three times, to ensure the company and the stock would survive the shorting and other market manipulations as the result of defendants’ actions.

One has to consider the influence a multi billion dollar company could have behind the scenes as it pertains to trying to eradicate there problems by pulling strings and manipulating the stock of there biggest threat. Maybe...just maybe...it has been the defendants hands in the cookie jar this whole time!!!
And maybe just maybe.....the SEC has wised up......and they blow this case wide open.
Like I said....i maybe grasping for straws
or maybe I am just coming out from under the rock and understanding what the hell has taken place and this deal is much much larger than the original theft now.
MATH DOES NOT LIE AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE!!! $SECI