InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

gonetopot

09/28/18 11:15 PM

#82798 RE: lineItemVeto #82789

https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/first-successful-treatment-of-canine-sarcoma-using-isopet-to-be-presented-at-veterinary-cancer-20180926-00265

I'm sorry it is at least 2 Universities (They have labs)

The IsoPet® Solutions division is using university veterinary hospitals to demonstrate the safety and therapeutic effectiveness for different animal cancers. The testing on feline sarcoma at the Washington State University is completed and the testing on canine soft tissue sarcomas at University of Missouri will continue

The Company recently obtained confirmation from the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine that IsoPet® is classified as a device for skin cancer therapy in cats and dogs. The FDA also reviewed and approved the product labeling. FDA does not require pre-market approval for veterinary devices so no additional approval is required for treating skin cancer, which is the largest market sector. Following this demonstration phase, Vivos can begin to generate revenues through the sale of IsoPet® to University animal hospitals and private veterinary clinic consortiums.

The Company is also engaging the FDA for clearance to market RadioGel™ for the treatment of advanced basal and squamous cell skin cancers in humans.


IsoPet® also has a short half-life - delivering more than 90% of its therapeutic radiation within 10 days. This compares favorably to other available treatment options requiring up to six weeks or more to deliver a full course of radiation therapy. Therapy can be safely administered as an out-patient procedure and the patient may return home without subsequent concern for radiation dose to the family.
icon url

JohnnyRothrock

09/28/18 11:36 PM

#82817 RE: lineItemVeto #82789

Lineitemveto: please see my last post about where and who they have been working with for years.

Ok going to dinner....your also welcome to go back to my 2015 posts here and some lenghty DD posts that show all this too back then: its been a long process, but all worth it.

Me? I would never be against any stock that just proved to kill a cancer, in a dog. With then the obvious implications this has in regards to us humans, as the whole human/mice/cancer studies that always have been, have to artificially be made to make that happen - dogs get cancer unfortuantely liike we do: naturally, so are a much better test subject.

So I for one,would be silent at most, but to actively you know what, lol, well...call me weak i dont have it in me.