Tell me what I wanted to hear? Maybe they told me inadvertently or just answered and shouldn't have...but I'm sure it wasn't to get rid of me, they could have just chosen not to answer me at all with what I asked them if that is the case.
If that was the case they would have told me yes this will be over on the 5th. This was not a clerk, this was SECI. I have screenshots of my communication with them on the 24th and 25th and other screenshots...which I would share on or after the summary judgement on the 5th if needed.
So, the same account putting out the tweets, etc. that everyone has believed and and told me this, means none of the tweets or this info is correct according to this being a clerk doing all the tweeting and replying to me?
Again, all I am trying to do is give people factual information, not my opinion or what people "think" is happening with the case.
I hope things work out for SECI, but facts also need to be laid out in regards to the process. I don't think now is the time to give people holding SECI false promises or false expectations, which again, is why I am giving facts, directly from the company.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
