'greennews' Actually, the point of view expressed in blog #21628. is from the retail investor's perspective. As far as management is concerned, this is in fact a GREAT move, it allows them to tie the stock to a familiar product, which they can continue to promote & hence sell more stock into the market, where it will meet with some acceptance, as long as the product remains out there. This will give them possibly years to move a good chunk of shares out of their hands & into the retail investor market, netting them a nice fat profit. @ the end of the day, those shares that remain unsold & in their treasury are a small price to pay for the gain that continues to be made on every sale, it also gives the Co.{Management} credibility by showing that they have a solid stake in ACOL{Medtainer}. I have sold & bought ACOL several times & done OK, I'm not here to bash or pump, but to see if it's possible to trade & where management sits on issues & past promises made. Please note that the reason ACOL was the Co. name, was because under that "umbrella" they were going to develop several different products and they would all come under the ACOL Corporate Logo{what happened to that promise?}, so that is why I don't pay attention to all of the BS News put out by penny stock Co.'s that are mainly there to "feed" the hopes of the gullible. TRADING the only real hope for profits for non-insiders. If you think penny stocks are like going to a petting zoo & you put your hand out, don't be surprised to see that you're missing an arm! GLYA Play it as you see it
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
