Do you not agree that the US IP side of things was supposed to be our money maker? That's what we were all saying after the disappointing results of the Canadian sale side.
I thought it was the US company that was said to be the valuable part of the company 1) because of the 270 patents and 2) because whatever money was paid by the purchaser specifically for the US operations and patents was separate from the money paid for the Canadian company.
Also it was said that creditors that advanced loans that were secured on Canadian assets were not entitled to makes claims to settle their debts on the money paid for the USA assets.
I really think PWC needs to clarify this properly.
I think the Judge was wrong to grant PWC till 26 October to keep the details of and the amount of the winning bid secret.