It is certainly disconcerting seeing in the 10K that we might never see the results of the P2 trial. Many here will use that wording as a sign that Leo knows pretty well that the results are not good so why would he bother to pay the CRO more money to just get bad news results, when money is desperately needed elsewhere.
I believe that whatever Leo could possibly know about the results would come from patient reports given to him througout the trial. He had those mostly last year, and if they were so bad why would he continue throwing money to the CRO even after the last patient was finished dosing at the end of 2017. Leo is frugal with the company's expenses.
I believe the P2 results are good and the wording in the 10K is there because the auditors insisted they be worded as such.
Neby,... you are one of the only people who can shed some light on this by elaborating on your famous post of last year. I have read all your posts numerous times, trying to discern if you are the kind of person to have made up a story like that. My conclusion is that you are not that type of person. But I could be wrong.
You alone can offer some much needed comfort to a whole lot of long suffering investors in IPIX, if you could find some way to enlighten us as to the veracity of your post,... even if it is between the lines.
I read the definition of truth as being: The way things were, the way things are, and the way things will be.
We seek to hear the truth.
Thanks!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
