Data, the decision is not “Vacate”. The decision is “Vacate and Remand”. Why did you leave “Remand” out of your post? In your opinion is it not important?
Just a quick question before I do a deeper “welcome back” dive based on the recent ruling and ensuing crapshow reaction from this board – why are you calling this a vacate and not a vacate and remand? This to me is what a remand is – you vacate the decision and send it back to the original Court with no clear instructions on how to proceed in terms of the estoppel issue (i.e. the first issue that will be looked at by the PTAB that will make or break WDDD’s ability to continue with the RPI issue).
More concisely, why is this a “vacate” in your eyes? This is a remand.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
